Topic 06 of 10
Security & risk review
What every security review asks: prompt injection, tool poisoning, threat models, data handling and the questionnaires that stand between you and go-live.
- 10 lessons
- 5.9 h reading
- 11.4 h hands-on
- 2 on the FDE path
Start lesson 01
Progress0 / 10
Lessons
- 01Guardrails the risk team can sign LabLayered safety checks, each with an action, a threshold and a log. Pro
- 02Defending against prompt injectionPath · stage 5Every document and tool result is untrusted input to an agent with tools. Pro
- 03Automated red-teamingAttack your own agent at scale before an auditor or a journalist does. Pro
- 04Bias and fairness evidenceSpecialisationMeasure and report fairness where hiring, lending and public services demand it. Pro
- 05Refusals and safe failureDecide what the agent does when it shouldn't act, and make that graceful. Pro
- 06SSO and provisioning for agentsGive the agent an enterprise identity before it gets a prompt. Pro
- 07Authorization and multi-tenancySpecialisationRBAC, ABAC and tenant isolation: the least privilege auditors actually check. Pro
- 08Agent credentials, from issue to revokeNon-human identities that don't outlive the project as standing risk. Pro
- 09Secrets, dependencies and network isolationNo hardcoded keys, pinned dependencies, and agents fenced off the network. Pro
- 10Threat modelling an AI systemPath · stage 5A shared vocabulary with the security team, and a register they can track. Pro